10.16.06

Don’t let an Over-priced Home be a Humbling Lesson

Posted in Colorado Springs Real Estate at 10:54 am by Angela Byrne

This article was published on www.RealtyTimes.com on October 2, 2006


Don’t Let an Over-priced Home be a Humbling Lesson
by Phoebe Chongchua

     Across the country the real estate market is slowing and the news media is reporting on the decline in sales, housing prices, and appreciation. Quite often this creates fear and a holding back by buyers as they wait to see just how low prices will go. One TV news station in Sacramento reported that desperate sellers are turning to ancient spiritual/religious rituals to help sell their homes, such as burying a statue of Saint Joseph in the backyard.
     Whether you take that tactic or not, perhaps the greatest influencer in getting your home sold is entering the market with a home that’s priced correctly. Over-priced homes won’t get favorable attention; they lose out to the ones that are reasonably priced.
     All sellers are looking for the highest price for their home. That’s why some sellers want to start at the highest point, maybe even asking a higher price than what they really believe they can get — the continued readjustment of price can be a humbling ride down to finding the reasonable price to sell the home.
    Still dropping the price sounds like an okay strategy, some sellers think.
Here’s the problem, especially in today’s current market conditions where numerous sellers are competing for fewer buyers — adjusting price down may come too late and cost the seller less in gain than if the home were priced correctly from the start.
     The majority of buyers use buyers’ agents to assist them with purchasing a property. Buyers’ agents will help the buyers find a home that’s right for them. If their buyers are interested in a particular home and it is priced too high (based on comparable properties sold) then the buyers’ agents will find their clients similar more reasonably priced homes to view in the same area.
     As a seller’s property that’s over-priced continues to sit on the market the listing loses its newness. There are typically fewer new listings than existing listings. Agents pay a great deal of attention to what’s new on the market. Homes that are priced correctly generate attention, activity and a sale; over-priced homes, on the other hand, sit for long periods, are passed over, and ultimately result in a price reduction.
     If a seller has an over-priced home on the market and then chooses to drop the price it sometimes goes overlooked. Because it’s not a new listing it’ll need a little more attention to get agents and buyers to notice that this same home is now being offered for less. Flyers, emails, ads, etc. have the challenge of enticing buyers and agents who wouldn’t give it a look at the higher price — to come see it now. Not an impossible battle, but again, the listing is no longer new and may be less appealing even with the price reduction.
     Obviously, the longer an over-priced home sits on the market, typically the more financial stress the seller begins to feel. If the seller has purchased a new home or must move to another state, suddenly the desperate seller syndrome sets in and lowball offers may have to be accepted due to financial circumstances.
     Pricing a home correctly initially is vital — otherwise the “we-can-always-drop-our-price” strategy could become a costly and humbling lesson in the end.

How to Get the Best Price in a Slowing Market

Posted in Colorado Springs Real Estate at 10:52 am by Angela Byrne

This article was published on www.RealtyTimes.com in October of 2006.
How To Get The Best Price In A Slowing Market
by Peter G. Miller

Reports across the country suggest that real estate in most areas of the country is no longer appreciating at the rates seen in the past few years. In fact, the National Association of Realtors reports that nationwide August existing home prices were actually down 1.7 percent from a year earlier.
None of this is terrible or awful unless you bought last year and must now sell. Those who have owned for a few years are well ahead in most communities.
Consider that in 2000, according to the National Association of Realtors, the typical existing home sold for $111,800 versus $225,000 in August.
So, what’s the best approach to selling in today’s market? Consider these five core points.

  1. Buyers are scarce relative to home supply.

While sellers have called the shots for the past few years, that’s no longer the case in most markets. No problem — adjust. Make your home the most attractive, best priced property in the neighborhood.
While pre-market prep could have been ignored in the recent past, today you have to paint, clean-up and repair before offering a home for sale. An MLS photo that shows a home with a lousy roof is evidence of a property that likely will not sell quickly or at full price.

  1. Remember that cash is still an issue.

While home prices may have slipped a touch, real estate continues to be hugely expensive for most buyers, especially first-timers who lack equity from a prior sale. Rather than reducing prices, offer to pay for buyer closing costs, thus lowering out-of-pocket purchaser cash requirements.

  1. Choose the right broker.

When comparing local brokers, look for such markers as recent success in your neighborhood, a high level of local activity and professional education.
In a slow market picking the right listing broker becomes especially important. Why? Because a broker with a strong local history is known and respected: If he or she offers a property at a given price that value is likely to be accepted as at least within the realm of reason.
As an example, last year we sold a property that was unlike virtually all nearby properties in terms of size (smaller house), lot (much bigger) and age (older than most). In other words, not an easy house to sell because there were no practical comparables. The broker — who had sold properties worth some $200 million in neighborhood real estate over the years — suggested a sale price which turned out to be exactly on target.
Alternatively, let’s say we used a less experienced broker, someone who was not an authority figure. The property might have sold for less because another broker might have been less credible. In effect, one of the values of using an experienced listing broker is to readily establish believable prices and terms, an important matter in a buyer’s market.

  1. Numbers Count.

Real estate sales are a by-product of exposure. If the odds of selling a home are 100 to one, if it takes 100 inquiries and visits to sell a property, then the quicker you get those inquires the better. No less important, if you can get more than 100 inquiries the odds of getting a top price and terms improve.
This means that when considering a listing broker you need to review the marketing plan with care. What, exactly is the broker going to do in terms of advertising, open houses, MLS placements, online marketing, broker relations, etc?
Remember that the marketing plan which works for one property may not work for another. Plans need to be specific to local markets, to particular homes and for current market conditions. The thinking that seemed so good last year may be inappropriate this year.

  1. It’s a business deal.

With some frequency I see homes priced for reasons that won’t work:

  • The property must sell for this price because I need $400,000 for the next home. The truth: Prices are established by the marketplace, not seller needs.
  • Similar homes in a different neighborhood command a particular price, therefore my house should sell at the same price. The truth: What happens elsewhere is irrelevant. What happens in the immediate neighborhood is what counts.
  • The Flombacks got $800,00 for their home so I should be getting at least that much. The truth: This is not about the Flombacks and should not be about seller ego. The real issue is about bricks and mortar. The Flombacks may have an objectively better house.
  • The buyer’s offer requires that we leave the washer and dryer — it’s an insult. The truth: Homes reflect our psychological identity, who we are, our social status, etc. But the marketplace reflects supply and demand. Leaving a washer and dryer may be a lot cheaper than not getting a sale for months on end.
  • This home would have sold for $500,000 last August and we will not accept a lower price. The truth: It’s not last August. It’s now and the marketplace reflects current supply and demand.

Sellers can be successful in any market so go forth and market — but do it right.

Realty TV Stretches Investment Reality

Posted in Colorado Springs Real Estate at 10:25 am by Angela Byrne

     In working with Buyers and Sellers, I regularly hear stories about “those reality TV shows” in which Buyers and/or Sellers walk away with the deal of a lifetime in a real estate transaction.  Unfortunately, these deals often fit under the “to good to be true” category.  A normal Buyer or Seller in a normal market may not see the same results.  Here’s a great article posted on www.RealtyTimes.com that give more information about these programs and what the reality is.
Enjoy!
Angela
    Realty TV Stretches Investment Reality
by Broderick PerkinsDon’t believe everything you see on television.
    Some documentaries, news reports, other well-researched features, as well as entire cable networks, do provide educational content as worthy as that from a college or university curriculum.
    However, most TV programming comes from the realm of entertainment where the emphasis is more on the rose-colored “tell” rather than true “vision.”
    That’s especially so when it comes to investment realty TV, more specifically, programming pushing flipping, say experts who’ve been there, done that.
     Flipping houses typically includes buying, perhaps cosmetically upgrading, and then quickly selling, within about six months or less, for what is hoped to be a hefty profit.
     In today’s market where double digit depreciation is, to some degree, about to replace double-digit appreciation, consumers should consider additional sources of real estate investment reality.
“It may look easy, fun, and exciting on TV,” says Scott Frank, a real estate investor from Atlanta who, along with Andy Heller, also an investor from Atlanta, co-authored “Buy Even Lower: The Regular People’s Guide to Real Estate Riches” (Kaplan Publishing, $18.95).
     “But remember, TV is entertainment. The real world can be anything but. I’ve found that most of the time people who jump into flipping real estate based on TV shows and/or hearsay from friends never fully know what they are getting themselves into,” Frank added.
     Flipping, never for the faint of heart, isn’t as easy as it may have been even a year ago, primarily because sales have slowed.
Speculators aren’t sticking around for good reason.
     It’s the same reason today’s housing market is better suited for the long term investor.
     Not only are sales a shadow of what they were a year ago, home prices are beginning to fall as well, further increasing the risks inherent to flipping.
During the second quarter this year, 2.4 percent of the existing homes sold in California had been owned for six months or less, down from 3.5 percent during the second quarter in 2005, according to HomeSmartReports.com, a San Juan Capistrano, CA-based real estate sales, value and risk analyst.
That was the lowest level of flipping since the first quarter of 2003, when it was also 2.4 percent. Flipping recently peaked in California during the first quarter of 2005 when 3.8 percent of properties were sold within six months of the purchase.
     As flipping has declined so have the profits — 24.7 percent of the second quarter’s flip sales in California resulted in a loss. The percentage of flippers who lost money was the highest since 25.8 percent during first quarter of 2002. A year ago only 14.4 percent of flipped sales resulted in a loss.
“A lot of people do not take into account that if you are in the business of buying and selling houses and are in an ordinary income/tax bracket, 35 percent of your gain goes to Uncle Sam and another 5 percent, depending where you are, goes to the state,” says Michael Eckerman, founder and CEO of Residential Asset Management, LLC, a real estate investment company in Phoenix, AZ.
     The rest can get chipped away by carrying costs including rental vacancies, fix-up costs, insurance and taxes, not to mention mortgage payment costs not covered when tenants are present — if they are part of the equation.
     Frank, Heller, Eckerman and a growing number of experts are coming out against get-rich-quick real estate investment advice spawned by a housing boom that came with a televised assist.
Here’s why, according to Frank and Heller.

  • Flipping takes time. Time is money, especially in a falling real estate market. To profit, it’s typically necessary to purchase a home at a deep discount, but the pool of such properties is small and that means lots of searching time right out of the gate.
  • Flipping is stressful. Unless you use a real estate agent (which cuts into your profits), you’ll probably deal with a host of people interested in buying the property. Each day the house remains unsold, holding costs eat away at your profits. Weighing if and when to reduce the sales price or to include a real estate agent adds more stress.
  • Flipping costs can get crazy. Typically, discounted homes are far from pristine. You’ll often need to make some improvements in a condensed period of time and sell at a profit large enough to offset buying, fixing up and selling costs. Surreal best describes those slick and dramatic transformations depicted on television.
  • Flipping can leave you holding the bag. You could get a discounted “dog” that needs more than a few coats of paint, one that’s in a bad neighborhood or other poor location or one with other conditions that contributed to your discounted purchase price, and now haunts your sale.

“Everybody has this day-trading mentality. Too many look at it as a quick fix, but it’s really just another wealth building strategy for the long term,” said Eckerman.
     He recalls his first property investment, one of the few he still owns. Purchased in Daly City, south of San Francisco in 1970 for about $40,000, the property’s value now approaches $1 million.
     “It’s paid off, free and clear and tenants are paying $2,000 in rent. If I had sold it for $50,000 and made $10,000, would I have been able to parlay that into $1 million?” Eckerman asks.
      It’s could be a good time to invest in flipping, provided you learn the ropes and hedge your bets.
      “Keep your regular day job. Don’t just flip. Buy the houses you can afford. Flip one or two. Hold onto the others,” says Eckerman.
Published: October 6, 2006